Monthly Archive for April, 2010

Success – Online Voter Registration Edition

As you are all aware, yesterday was the final day to register in time to vote in the May Primary election.

Today, we got some great news in the form of voter registration data from yesterday; 3,754 Oregonians registered to vote. That is tremendous result, but what makes it even more fantastic is that 2,967 of those registrations were completed online with our Online Voter Registration system. The day before the deadline 1,223 people registered online.

It’s exciting to see the Online Voter Registration system gaining some traction.

If you didn’t get registered in time to take part in this May’s election, please do head over to our Online Voter Registration system and get registered for the Primary Election in November.

“Are you registered to Vote? At your current address?”

This was the major question on the University of Oregon’s campus this afternoon as OSPIRG members braved the inclimate weather in a last ditch attempt to register voters before today’s 5:00pm registration deadline. Volunteers set up a table with a full assortment of registration cards as well as a laptop with Internet access pointed to our online voter registration system.

Today’s push caps a 2-week effort by voter registration organizations on campus to engage student voters ahead of Oregon’s May Primary election.

The Oregon Student Association, another student group registering students on campus, has been conducting ‘class raps.’ These raps send OSA volunteers into classrooms to deliver a short presentation to students on how elections may affect them, and then offer them the opportunity to register to vote. Often the classrooms are chosen for their student count and class level to get the greatest impact.

OSA has also been holding special events on campus. The Floats and Votes event offered students Rootbeer floats and then gave them the chance to get regsitered,

OSA tells me that along with the ASUO, they have registered nearly 700 students ahead of today’s deadline.

Groups on campus have found the new online voter registration tool useful, especially since they can promote voter registration easily over social networking sites like Facebook. One volunteer told me, “Before, we sent emails out to our member list reminding them to get registered. Now, we can post a direct link to the online voter registration system on Facebook. Then our members can post the link as well and it gets out to way more people.”

The good news/bad news from today’s push was that only a handful of students registered to vote in front of the EMU; 95% of them were already registered.

Are you registered to vote? You can check here.

If not, you can get registered NOW and it’s easy. Just head over to our Online Voter Registration system and take care of it.

Vote Fraud is Extremely Rare and Always Unacceptable

The following is a Letter to the Editor By Secretary of State Kate Brown

Oregonians have many good reasons to be proud of our election system.

Our voter turnout is among the highest in the country. Our vote-by-mail system is admired throughout the United States and around the world. It’s convenient and enjoys wide popular support in the state. Most importantly, it’s secure.

Despite these successes, I hear concerns about the safety of our system. Some people still fear that it’s rife with fraud, including illegal immigrants registering and voting or thousands of deceased Oregonians still on the voter rolls and receiving ballots.

I listen carefully to these concerns, but the fact of the matter is they’re wrong. Fraud is extremely rare in Oregon, and when it happens we take it very seriously. Oregonians have cast more than 15 million ballots by mail since 2000. In that time we have investigated thousands of fraud complaints, including examples of those mentioned above.

Those thousands of investigations resulted in nine prosecutions. We’ve issued fines and jail terms and seen deportations. But nine prosecutions out of thousands of investigations tells us we’re not looking at systemic voter fraud. Most complaints are well-intentioned but unfounded.

There are reasons why such fraud is so rare. For starters, our county clerks and their staffs on the front lines of the effort work hard every day to make sure voter rolls are clean, accurate and secure. We have a rigorous signature verification system to ensure only legally eligible voters cast a ballot, and our election teams are trained by forensics experts.

We also have the help of federal immigration authorities. Before swearing in new citizens, immigration officials check to make sure prospective citizens weren’t on voter rolls or voted before achieving legal citizenship. A citizenship petition can be denied if they were.

Perhaps the greatest deterrents are the penalties for a Class C felony. That’s the crime when someone ineligible casts a ballot, votes under a false name, forges a signature on a ballot envelope or falsely registers to vote. If they do manage to get by our security checks, the Oregon Department of Justice will prosecute and then we’re talking five years in prison, a $125,000 fine and, when appropriate, deportation.

For example, a Josephine County man who was not a citizen forged the name of his younger brother, a citizen, on a voter registration card. We investigated, the Department of Justice prosecuted and he was convicted of four felonies and deported. Now he can never become an American. In Marion County court, 80-year-old Lafayette F. Keaton of Portland faces two felony charges that he voted under the names of dead relatives.

Some cases involve human error. One woman, not a citizen, marked on the voter registration form that she was. She apparently misunderstood the question. We caught it and revoked her registration right away. She wasn’t prosecuted because it appeared to be an honest mistake.

We deploy a full arsenal of tools against voter fraud, including long prison terms, heavy fines and deportation. We have checks and balances at all levels of the system. And we have the Department of Justice prosecutors backing us up.

As chief elections officer, it’s my job to protect the integrity of the ballot. If you suspect any kind of fraud at all, you should call us at 503-986-1518 with as many details as possible. Believe me, we’ll investigate.

Kate Brown is Oregon Secretary of State.

Voter’s Pamphlets Going Out Wednesday

On Wednesday, our elections division will send out nearly 1.7 million Voters’ Pamphlets to households throughout the state ahead of the May, 18th primary election.

On the ballot are partisan primary elections for U.S. Senate, governor, state treasurer, Oregon’s five seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, the State House and half the State Senate. Other positions on the ballot include the superintendent of public instruction, the Oregon Supreme Court, the Oregon Court of Appeals, circuit court judges, district attorneys and county judges, which are a mostly administrative posts in small counties.

Two ballot measures will also be featured on the May ballot. Measure 68 would allow the state to issue bonds matching voter-approved school district bonds for capital expenditures, while Measure 69 would update the authority for lowest costs borrowing by community colleges and public universities. As is always the case, the pamphlet gives both supporting and opposing sides of any given ballot measures the opportunity to make their case to the public.

Can’t wait to get your hands on the Voters’ Pamphlet? Well, an online version intended for Military/Overseas voters can be found here.

And don’t forget, it’s not too late to Register to vote! Click the image below to head over to our Online Voter Registration system before April 27th.

Voter Registration TV Spot

We are proud to share our new Online Voter Registration TV spot, which is showing up on Television screens across the state:

This is the first of many videos we will be adding to our new YouTube channel. Stay tuned for more TV spots and other videos from the Secretary of State’s office.

Don’t forget to goto Oregonvotes.org for more all the elections related information you might need. Then, go get registered to vote before the April 27th deadline!

Oregon Joins 17 Other States in Urging a Decision for Open Government

Oregon has joined 17 other states in urging the U.S. Supreme Court to guarantee that the petitions collected for citizen initiatives remain public records.

Last Tuesday, Oregon joined 17 other states in an amicus curiae brief filed by Ohio in Doe v. Reed, which asks the court to find that initiative petitions are exempt from state public records laws and may be kept secret. The court will hear oral arguments in the case April 28.

Attorney General John Kroger explained the position of those filing the brief, in terms of Oregon’s commitment to open government, “Oregon has a compelling interest in preventing election fraud, ensuring the integrity of its elections and promoting open government,” said Attorney General Kroger. “I really appreciate Secretary of State Brown’s leadership on this issue.” He went on to say that designating initiative petitions as secret would violate Oregon’s long tradition of open government and undermine public confidence in the citizen initiative system, which has been a critical part of Oregon’s political culture for 108 years.

In recent years, other states have experienced incidents of petition fraud. In 2006 alone, the Montana Supreme Court invalidated every signature collected by non-resident petition circulators and three ballot initiatives because the circulators engaged in bait-and-switch tactics. The Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down an initiative petition because of a pervasive pattern of wrongdoing and fraud in the signature collection process, and a federal district court concluded that circulators misrepresented the purpose of a Michigan initiative petition.

Doe v. Reed began with a citizen effort to reverse a domestic partnership law passed in 2009 by the Washington Legislature. Opponents turned in enough signatures to place the referendum on the November 2009 ballot. Voters rejected the effort and upheld the law.

Independent groups sought the names of the voters who signed the petitions and supporters of the measure sued Secretary of State Sam Reed, hoping to keep the signers’ names secret. The challenge to Washington’s open records law was rejected at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and now will be heard by Supreme Court, a decision is expected by early summer.

So what do you think? Should petitions be public record or should the become private after they’ve been turned in?