Monthly Archive for October, 2009

Stories from the Road – October

As part of a regular series, Secretary of State Kate Brown logged this report from her time on the road.

Soon after taking office in January I promised to visit all of Oregon’s 36 counties.

It was easy to ignore the groans from my staff but a little more difficult to arrange the logistics. This is, as we know, a large state, more than 98,000 square miles, making it the ninth largest in the country. My travels reminded me of our good fortune in living in such a spectacularly beautiful state.

I’m happy to report that even with the press of the Legis­lature, I’ve so far visited 30 counties and have plans in the works to visit the other 6 by the end of 2009.

But the best part of my travels have been meeting with the county clerks and their staffs and hearing about the issues they work with, which are quite different than what goes on in the more urban counties west of the Cascades. Some of our smaller counties have been hit hard by the downturn in the economy, especially those dependant on the resource industries, and they struggle to keep up with matters bigger counties take for granted.

In Prineville, Crook County Clerk Dee Berman gave me a tour of the wonderful stone county courthouse that celebrated its 100th birthday this year. She also told me a story about how she agreed last fall to drive way out of town to help a sight-impaired man vote. “As long as you’re coming;’ he added, “would you mind stopping to pick me up a can of coffee and a gallon of milk? The one with the red lid.” She said she would and brought him some doughnuts as well.

SoS June 4-5 Road Trip 010-resized

Secretary Brown with Grant County Chief Deputy Clerk Brenda Percy

In Grant County, Chief Deputy Clerk Brenda Percy showed me the huge books that are still used to record all official county transactions: deeds, marriages, name changes, property transactions, everything. Like other rural counties, they have shelves filled with these giant ledgers that look like something out of Gringott’s Bank in the Harry Potter novels. They can post some things on their web site, but their entire history is in those books and they can’t even afford to put everything on microfilm. One fire could wipe out their history.

So I’m going to ask the Legislature to find ways to help the counties preserve their history and bring their record ­keeping up to date. I want to make sure we do what we can to preserve this important part of Oregon history.

As part of my efforts, this month I embarked on a two day trip through Malheur and Harney counties.

My first stop with the Argus Observer, where I was interviewed for a story. I was happy to see Pat Caldwell, the Argus Observer’s editor and one of 5 Caldwell brothers, some of whom I know through their hard work here in Oregon.

After that, we took a trip to meet with Harney County Clerk, Maria Iturriaga. She gave us some tremendous input on the recall process in rural communities that I am talking with my staff about. She told me that recall laws are too broad and that the recall process is extremely divisive in rural communities. The example she gave me was a recall that took place 15 years ago, which left wounds that are still healing to this day.

Next up was a Lunch Forum hosted by the Treasure Valley Community College’s Business Center and the local Rotary club, followed by a meeting with the Harney County Commissioners. In both of these meetings, I came away with the same, strong message: Times are tough and the community needs to use a team approach to tackle the challenges it’s faced with; it doesn’t really matter if I agree with you politically. In fact, one of the commissioners said to the group, “If your house is on fire, it doesn’t matter if i like you or not, you need me to help you put it out”

I have to agree. I’ve seen how this State is struggling in this time of economic crisis and I believe that the best way forward is to join hands with our political neighbors and forge ahead as a unit. Our figurative house is burning, we need to work together to put out the fire.

October is Archives Month – Oregon Post-WWII

Click to Enlarge

This photo from the Highway Department’s archive shows some young tourists enjoying a sunny day in their convertible with Mt. Hood in the background.

After the Second World War ended, the State of Oregon experienced a tourism boom. State parks were full, Highway 99 was busy and during the Centennial of our statehood and colorful festivals were visited in cities throughout Oregon.

This picture is one of many in our Archives Division’s web exhibit on the State of Oregon during and after the second world war, called ‘Life on the Home Front: Oregon Responds to World War II’.

October has been Archives Month. We hope that you got a chance to explore the Archives Division’s wealth of online and offline resources.

What is Government 2.0 anyhow?

Since the launch of this blog, a few folks have asked us what this whole social media initiative is all about. We like to point out that we’re at the forefront, in Oregon, of what people are referring to as Government 2.0 or Gov 2.0, for short. Much of the time that response begs another, equally important question: what is government 2.0 anyhow?

To gain further insight in to what Gov 2.0 is and what that means for us here at the Secretary of State’s office, let’s take a closer look at Gov 2.0; starting with a primer on the Web 2.0 ‘revolution’ and ending with a discussion on some of the ways Gov 2.0 can move government communication and accountability forward, while delivering concrete savings to Oregonians.

From Web 1.0 to Web 2.0: An internet revolution

Source: <a href=To really understand the impact Web 2.0, we have to be perfectly clear that before its epoch, there was just ‘the web’. That is to say, Web 2.0 changed the way people communicated over the internet so drastically, the term Web 1.0 had to be used in order to describe what things were like ‘in the good ol’ days’. As the image to the left shows, Web 1.0 was essentially anchored around the web site, which organized and shared information about an online entity in a centralized, static fashion; the  equivalent of someone delivering a sermon or a speech. Organizations were connected to customers through email and telephone lines, but that was about the limit of interaction between the organization and the end-user.

Web 2.0 didn’t redesign the wheel, so much as it the re-worked the function of the wheel. It transformed the internet from a collection of websites to a platform for participation.

This transformation happened in a few waves, starting with the advent of Social media portals like Myspace followed by Facebook and LinkedIn, which allowed for previously unheard of networking online. Next, weblogs or blogs exploded onto the scene, creating a publishing platform that allowed the code illiterate to write about anything from a detailed recounting of their dinner date to substantive information and analysis on politics, news, or business; the possibilities were endless. Newly networked users quickly took advantage, becoming active contributors, content creators, and collaborators across a host of web sites and platforms.

With this boom of new content also came the need for new means of tracking and wrangling all of this information together. This was accomplished with through web syndication technology like RSS (Real Simple Syndication). Nearly every blogging platform and social networking site adopted an RSS feed. Once the RSS feed is in place, users  subscribe using news feed software like google reader and voila!, by visiting one site users could see everything going on throughout all of their favorite sites.

Web 2.0 also changed the way users discovered this information, introducing the term folksonomy to the internet vocabulary. Folksonomy refers to the system of collaboratively classifying content through the use of tags. An example of this can be seen in this search for all blog entries on the WordPress website for ‘Elections’:

electionssearch

Here we see the first search result and at the very bottom of that result are a number of tags, created by the author. In this example we have Lebanon, Advertisement, Campaign, etc. By clicking on any of those tag links, a user is presented all websites which share that tag. Were you on Maya Zankoul’s blog when you clicked the tag for Lebanon, you would find every entry on her blog that she tagged as Lebanon relevant.

With all of this, the transition looked like this:

Source: a href=

Continue reading ‘What is Government 2.0 anyhow?’

October is Archives Month – The Elks Lodge

Click for a larger image

From 1913-1969 the Oregon State Board of Control coordinated the management of state institutions and the construction of state buildings.

One such building was the Portland Elks Lodge. Built in 1923, this tremendous building, which is now part of the Governor Hotel, has been used for many things since its construction. This 1937 modification of the original 1924 picture, shows a proposed reconfiguration of the building for use as a State office building. Apparently, someone thought it important for this State office building to have a cards room and a billiard room!

Our Archives Division has loads of records from the Oregon State Board of Control online and in Salem at its brick and mortar home.

October is Archives Month – Willamette Cattle Company Agreement

Click for larger image

In honor of October being Archives Month, we wanted to bring out some of the cooler things the Archives has in its online holdings. Today’s submission is an written agreement of the Willamette Cattle Company from the year 1837.

To learn more about this document, click here. Stay tuned for more exciting items from the State archives or go explore for yourself!

Celebrating 100 Years of Suffrage

Abigail Scott Duniway (right) arrives to vote in Portland for a 1914 election.  Source: SoS Archives Division

Abigail Scott Duniway (right) arrives to vote in Portland for a 1914 election. Source: SoS Archives Division

Planning will get under way this fall for an important anniversary in Oregon’s political and cultural history.

In 1912, Oregon voters gave women the full right to vote but it wasn’t an easy effort. Five previous statewide suffrage ballot measures had failed in the previous three decades, the most recent by increasingly large margins. Its final success in 1912 still placed Oregon among the first states to give women the complete right to vote and it came full eight years before ratification of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In 2012, Oregon will celebrate the suffrage centennial with appropriate displays and retrospectives coordinated by the Oregon Archives Divisions. Earlier this month, Secretary of State Kate Brown will take part in a small reception at the Archives Building to mark the start of planning for the centennial celebration.

“I’m really excited to be a part of this process,” Brown said. “This was a vote that changed the face of Oregon and it came with the support of some brave and colorful figures from our past. This is a golden page in Oregon history.”

Taking part in the celebration will be the Oregon Women Suffrage Centennial Project, a part of the Northwest History Network. The project has already started a web site, www.oregonsuffrage.org, that takes a close look at Oregon’s suffrage movement with articles, a time line and photos.

President Teddy Roosevelt took a leading role in the Progressive Era. Source: Oregon SoS Archives

Full suffrage for women had its first debate in the Oregon Legislature in 1872. By 1878 women – if taxpayers — won the right to vote in school elections only. By 1912, suffrage had been defeated in five statewide votes, the first in 1884 and 1900, put before voters by the Legislature, and again in 1906, 1908 and 1910, put on the ballot by the newly-established right to citizen initiative. The last three measures lost by increasing larger margins, going from 44 percent support in 1906, to 49 percent in 1908 and 37 percent in 1910.

But 1912 saw a groundswell toward progressive causes, which included women’s suffrage. In 1912, Theodore Roosevelt and his Progressive Party (known as the Bull Moosers) came in second in Oregon to Woodrow Wilson in the presidential balloting. And that year, after five defeats, suffrage finally won approval, gaining 51.7 percent of the vote.

We’ll keep you updated on other events leading up to the suffrage centennial.

Q&A with our New Elections Director

On Aug. 31, Stephen N. Trout became the new director of the Oregon Elections Division. An attorney, Trout came to Oregon after a national search and brought with him extensive expertise in election law and election administration at the state and local levels of government. Here are a few questions for Steve about the state of the Oregon Elections Division.


Q. What are biggest challenges facing Oregon elections?

A. We face a series of changing rules at the state and federal level with limited resources. We also face significant changes in technology, like the challenges in developing our online voter registration system.

Q. How will that work?

A. We’re in the process right now of developing the system and we expect to have it in place by March 1, 2010, in time to register for the May primary.

It will allow eligible Oregonians to register online but only if they have a signature on file with the state Motor Vehicle Services Division. In other words, you’ll only be able to register online if you have a driver’s license or some kind or a state ID card.

Q. What’s the advantage?

A. First of all, it’s going to be cheaper because there will be less paperwork at the state level. It’s going to make registration easier for Oregonians in the military. It will be easier for the homebound or those with disabilities. And it’s going to be easier for young people who spend a lot of time online. It’s going to make registration easier for everyone.

Q. Will it be secure?

A. It will be very secure. The signature will be the validating element. It carries the same security protections as those in place now with paperwork. Even more, I should say. When registering on paper, you have to swear under penalty of a class C felony the information is accurate. When registering online, you cannot fill out the information until you’ve sworn that oath and a violation carries a penalty of five years in prison and a $125,000 fine.

Q. Do we have a secure voting system?

A. I have full confidence in the security of all of our voting systems. Anyone could break into Fort Knox if there weren’t any guards, and voting systems are no different. Our voting system guards are our laws and regulations, and rules and procedures. We are constantly updating them to maintain the highest level of security possible. The counties submit security plans to our office which we review to make sure that their voting processes and equipment are as secure as possible. Our most important job is to provide the citizens of Oregon with the most secure and accurate voting systems possible.

Q. What are your long-term goals for the Elections Division?

A. We want to continue to be at the forefront of administering elections in this country. We’ll use all the resources at our disposal to make the system as efficient as possible and to make sure every eligible voter has the opportunity to cast a ballot in as accurate and secure a manner as possible.

Q. How good is our system compared to other states?

A. Our vote-by-mail is the model for the nation and we’ll continue to improve on that. Our system is one of the cleanest, most efficient, most accurate and most secure in the country and we intend to keep it that way.

October is Archives Month

A copyright from Archives

When it comes to the ‘wow factor’, our Archives Division is about as good as it gets in State government. Since 1947, Archives has been the home of the state’s most valuable and indeed invaluable records, spanning from the provisional and territorial governments through to the present day.

Taking a quick tour of the Archives website, one can find information on genealogical research, a collection of Governor’s records, some incredible Web exhibits, and a link to the online version of the Oregon Blue Book; an encyclopedia of Oregon knowledge. That isn’t even to speak of the amazing stuff you can check out during a personal visit to Archives here in Salem.

Beach goers in 1940

Beach goers in 1940

Once a year since 1989, Archives divisions across the country have taken center stage with an officially recognized Archives Week or Month. In Oregon, Governor Ted Kulongoski made a formal proclamation for Oregon Archives Week, and later Archives Month, starting in 2004. At that point our State joined in supporting Archivists efforts to: increase the public’s awareness of archives and historical records; educate people, organizations and others about preserving their own historical records; and encouraging people to explore and use the archives in their area.

This year, the Oregon State Historical Records Advisory Board (SHRAB) applied for, and received National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC) grant funds in part to support the printing and distribution of a poster commemorating Oregon Archives Month.

Archives Month programs vary from state to state and usually include a broad range of activities such as award presentations, exhibits, lectures, open houses and workshops. To get up to date information on Archives Month events in Oregon, check out the Archives month website.

Current events include the Multnomah Library’s “The Origins of Multnomah County Library: Primary Sources Celebrating Oregon & National Archives Month”, which will run through November 23. An event sponsored by the University of Oregon will celebrate home movies, while two separate events will be taking place on the Oregon State University campus this month, details can be found here.

Archives month is a tremendous opportunity for Oregonians to explore the State’s rich past with a full plate of fantastic events. Should you miss out on the fun this month, don’t fret; our Archives division is open year round to help you find whatever you might be looking for.

Want to vote in the Nov. 3 elections? Register now!

Today is the last day to register to vote in the Nov. 3 elections.

Voters all over the state will make choices in how to administer cities, schools and a multitude of local service districts. These aren’t issues that will likely make the statewide radar, but they do matter a lot to those who they will affect. And that is what this election is about; communities making critical choices on vital issues that will affect them for years to come.

Perhaps the biggest ballot measure in the state this fall is Central Oregon Community College’s request for $41.6 million in bonds for campus improvements. Voters in all or parts of six central Oregon counties will decide the fate of the bonds.

Most of the remaining requests concern local services; fire districts, water districts, library districts, animal protection districts, amongst others. For instance, the city of Bandon is asking for money for police services, while the Shangri-La Water District in Lane County is asking for money for system repairs. The city of Ashland wants to main a tax on food and beverages to pay for waste-water services and finally the Rogue River Rural Fire Protection District is asking for money to maintain services.

Close on the heels of the registration deadline is the day when ballots start going in the mail. That will begin on Friday.

And remember to have your ballots in the hands of your local elections office no later than 8 p.m. on Election Day, Nov. 3. Postmarks don’t count.

Referenda, qualified

In an earlier blog, we mentioned two referenda that were circulating in hopes of getting on the 2010 special election ballot. Today the Elections Division has announced that both the petitions referring both HB 2649 and HB 3405 to voters have indeed received the  required amount of signatures to qualify for the ballot.

Measure 66, which will refer HB 2649 to voters gathered 98,842 valid signatures, plenty to satisfy the constitutional requirement of 55,179 needed. HB 2649, which passed in the 2009 Legislative session, concerns the State’s personal income tax.

The other referendum, now titled Measure 67 received 99,471 valid signatures, a full 80.7% of the 123,324 signatures accepted for verification. The measure will refer HB 3405, a bill which pertains to corporate income taxes, to Oregon’s voters.

This is hardly the first time that the ‘Oregon System‘ has been used to give Oregon’s voters the opportunity to repeal enrolled legislation, but it will be the first time since 2004 that Oregon has voted on  statewide referenda.

To be eligible to vote on these referenda Oregonians will need to be
registered to vote no later than January 5, 2010. Please contact our  Elections division with questions about getting registered.